https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384996 The appeal seeking restoration was dismissed as the appeal was filed after the condonable period, leading to rejection by Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA. Despite efforts to recall and restore the appeal, it was ultimately dismissed in accordance with the Supreme Court's ruling in Singh Enterprises, as the Tribunal lacked authority to condone the delay beyond the permissible period. en-us Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Aug 2019 07:51:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384996 The appeal seeking restoration was dismissed as the appeal was filed after the condonable period, leading to rejection by Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA. Despite efforts to recall and restore the appeal, it was ultimately dismissed in accordance with the Supreme Court's ruling in Singh Enterprises, as the Tribunal lacked authority to condone the delay beyond the permissible period. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384996