https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384995 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with any consequential benefits as per the law. The decision was based on the interpretation of legal precedents, including judgments from the High Courts of Jharkhand and Gujarat, as well as the Apex Court ruling in a similar case. Despite the respondent's arguments regarding conflicting judgments and the doctrine of mutuality, the Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the specific context of the case under the Finance Act, 1994. en-us Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Aug 2019 07:51:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384995 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with any consequential benefits as per the law. The decision was based on the interpretation of legal precedents, including judgments from the High Courts of Jharkhand and Gujarat, as well as the Apex Court ruling in a similar case. Despite the respondent's arguments regarding conflicting judgments and the doctrine of mutuality, the Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the specific context of the case under the Finance Act, 1994. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384995