https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282833 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the validity of the second FIR lodged in the case. The Court held that filing a counter FIR related to the same incident is permissible when different accused persons are involved, emphasizing that rival versions of the same incident can warrant multiple FIRs. The Court concluded that quashing the FIRs would deny justice to the complainants, and therefore, upheld the investigation based on the second FIR. en-us Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Aug 2019 16:20:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282833 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the validity of the second FIR lodged in the case. The Court held that filing a counter FIR related to the same incident is permissible when different accused persons are involved, emphasizing that rival versions of the same incident can warrant multiple FIRs. The Court concluded that quashing the FIRs would deny justice to the complainants, and therefore, upheld the investigation based on the second FIR. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282833