<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (4) TMI 27 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19501</link>
    <description>Reasonable gratuity paid to an ex-working director may be deductible as business expenditure where it is made under an established company practice, has a real business nexus, and is commercially expedient. Voluntary character alone does not disqualify the outlay. The analysis treats gratuity, bonus, retrenchment compensation, and termination compensation as potentially allowable when the payment is reasonable and facilitates the carrying on of the business. On the facts discussed, the director had served the company for over two decades, the practice of paying gratuity was established and later affirmed by board resolution, and the deduction was accepted in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:11:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (4) TMI 27 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19501</link>
      <description>Reasonable gratuity paid to an ex-working director may be deductible as business expenditure where it is made under an established company practice, has a real business nexus, and is commercially expedient. Voluntary character alone does not disqualify the outlay. The analysis treats gratuity, bonus, retrenchment compensation, and termination compensation as potentially allowable when the payment is reasonable and facilitates the carrying on of the business. On the facts discussed, the director had served the company for over two decades, the practice of paying gratuity was established and later affirmed by board resolution, and the deduction was accepted in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>