<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Rule 8(3A) of the CER, 2002</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=115364</link>
    <description>If Rule 8(3A) has been judicially declared unconstitutional with a final, unstayed judgment, orders confirming demands based on that rule are legally vulnerable and may be invalidated; however, where the department has appealed or obtained a stay, or no finality has been reached, the demand may be sustained until final adjudication. Parties must cite the controlling case law and raise the objection before the authority to preserve the contention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 15:29:42 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Rule 8(3A) of the CER, 2002</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=115364</link>
      <description>If Rule 8(3A) has been judicially declared unconstitutional with a final, unstayed judgment, orders confirming demands based on that rule are legally vulnerable and may be invalidated; however, where the department has appealed or obtained a stay, or no finality has been reached, the demand may be sustained until final adjudication. Parties must cite the controlling case law and raise the objection before the authority to preserve the contention.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 15:29:42 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=115364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>