https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384962 The appellant challenged an order of detention under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and a notice issued under sub-section (3) of the same Act. The High Court directed the authorities to issue a detailed order within four weeks and allowed the appellant to submit additional documents. The Court emphasized the need to determine the authenticity of the documents and whether the appellant can be considered the owner of the detained goods. The appellant was given one more week to provide explanations and documents, with the factual finding on ownership status to be determined by the authority as per the Single Judge's order. en-us Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Mar 2025 10:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384962 The appellant challenged an order of detention under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and a notice issued under sub-section (3) of the same Act. The High Court directed the authorities to issue a detailed order within four weeks and allowed the appellant to submit additional documents. The Court emphasized the need to determine the authenticity of the documents and whether the appellant can be considered the owner of the detained goods. The appellant was given one more week to provide explanations and documents, with the factual finding on ownership status to be determined by the authority as per the Single Judge's order. Case-Laws GST Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384962