<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1143 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384954</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld SEBI&#039;s findings that the appellant&#039;s operations constituted a collective investment scheme under Section 11AA of the SEBI Act. SEBI directed the appellant to refund investors&#039; money within three months. The Tribunal allowed an 18-month refund period but dismissed the subsequent appeal to the Supreme Court. SEBI rejected the appellant&#039;s extension request and initiated recovery proceedings. The Tribunal found Regulation 73 of the CIS Regulations inapplicable to the appellant&#039;s scheme. The appellant&#039;s non-cooperation with the appointed auditor and dilatory tactics led to the rejection of their extension request. All appeals and applications were dismissed, affirming SEBI&#039;s orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 08:03:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1143 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384954</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld SEBI&#039;s findings that the appellant&#039;s operations constituted a collective investment scheme under Section 11AA of the SEBI Act. SEBI directed the appellant to refund investors&#039; money within three months. The Tribunal allowed an 18-month refund period but dismissed the subsequent appeal to the Supreme Court. SEBI rejected the appellant&#039;s extension request and initiated recovery proceedings. The Tribunal found Regulation 73 of the CIS Regulations inapplicable to the appellant&#039;s scheme. The appellant&#039;s non-cooperation with the appointed auditor and dilatory tactics led to the rejection of their extension request. All appeals and applications were dismissed, affirming SEBI&#039;s orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>