<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1136 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384947</link>
    <description>The court found the refusal to provide copies of seized documents unjustified and ordered the respondent authorities to furnish them within two weeks, in line with the petitioner&#039;s rights under Section 67(5) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017. The writ petition was disposed of with a directive for compliance with this order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 10:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1136 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384947</link>
      <description>The court found the refusal to provide copies of seized documents unjustified and ordered the respondent authorities to furnish them within two weeks, in line with the petitioner&#039;s rights under Section 67(5) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017. The writ petition was disposed of with a directive for compliance with this order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>