<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1124 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384935</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the penalty appeal, as the addition forming the basis for the penalty was overturned in the quantum appeal, rendering the penalty unjustified. The appellant successfully argued that the penalty confirmation was based on a genuine difference of opinion and procedural irregularities. The Tribunal emphasized that the penalty was unwarranted due to the deletion of certain additions, which nullified the basis for the penalty imposed by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 15:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1124 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384935</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the penalty appeal, as the addition forming the basis for the penalty was overturned in the quantum appeal, rendering the penalty unjustified. The appellant successfully argued that the penalty confirmation was based on a genuine difference of opinion and procedural irregularities. The Tribunal emphasized that the penalty was unwarranted due to the deletion of certain additions, which nullified the basis for the penalty imposed by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>