<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds CIT(A) Decision: No Evidence of Excessive Management Fees u/ss 40A(2) and 37; Adjustment Deleted.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48906</link>
    <description>TP Adjustment u/s 40A(2) r.w.s 37 - management fee - Neither the TPO nor the AO have brought any material on record indicating the assessee’s excessive impugned payments as the statutory provision in question is applicable only for excessive component of the relevant heads of the expenditure than that in entirety - the CIT(A) action deleting the upward adjustment is affirmed</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 07:52:40 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 07:52:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds CIT(A) Decision: No Evidence of Excessive Management Fees u/ss 40A(2) and 37; Adjustment Deleted.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48906</link>
      <description>TP Adjustment u/s 40A(2) r.w.s 37 - management fee - Neither the TPO nor the AO have brought any material on record indicating the assessee’s excessive impugned payments as the statutory provision in question is applicable only for excessive component of the relevant heads of the expenditure than that in entirety - the CIT(A) action deleting the upward adjustment is affirmed</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 07:52:40 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>