<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1118 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384929</link>
    <description>The tribunal affirmed the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s decision to treat the share capital/premium as unexplained cash credits under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, considering the lack of satisfactory explanation on the source of funds. The tribunal also upheld the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for concealing income related to the unexplained cash credits. The appeals by the assessee were dismissed, and the decision was pronounced on 21/08/2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 17:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584903" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1118 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384929</link>
      <description>The tribunal affirmed the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s decision to treat the share capital/premium as unexplained cash credits under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, considering the lack of satisfactory explanation on the source of funds. The tribunal also upheld the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for concealing income related to the unexplained cash credits. The appeals by the assessee were dismissed, and the decision was pronounced on 21/08/2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>