https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384923 In a fiscal assessment challenge under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, the Madras HC reaffirmed that writ jurisdiction should ordinarily not be invoked where an effective statutory appeal is available, especially in revenue matters. As the challenge to the revised assessment turned largely on facts and the petitioner had an efficacious appeal under Section 51, the Court declined to entertain the writ on merits and relegated the petitioner to the appellate remedy. It further directed the appellate authority not to insist on any fresh pre-deposit, noting that the petitioner had already deposited 50% in stages. The impugned order was kept in abeyance if the appeal was pursued within time. en-us Wed, 07 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Aug 2019 07:52:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384923 In a fiscal assessment challenge under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, the Madras HC reaffirmed that writ jurisdiction should ordinarily not be invoked where an effective statutory appeal is available, especially in revenue matters. As the challenge to the revised assessment turned largely on facts and the petitioner had an efficacious appeal under Section 51, the Court declined to entertain the writ on merits and relegated the petitioner to the appellate remedy. It further directed the appellate authority not to insist on any fresh pre-deposit, noting that the petitioner had already deposited 50% in stages. The impugned order was kept in abeyance if the appeal was pursued within time. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 07 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384923