https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384911 The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original due to insufficient evidence of non-accounting and removal of excisable goods. It found the adjudicating authority rushed the proceedings without proper investigation, leading to an unsustainable order. The appellant's adherence to the ERP system and lack of discrepancies supported their defense. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the necessity of thorough investigations and considering compliance methods like the ERP system. en-us Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Aug 2019 07:41:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384911 The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original due to insufficient evidence of non-accounting and removal of excisable goods. It found the adjudicating authority rushed the proceedings without proper investigation, leading to an unsustainable order. The appellant's adherence to the ERP system and lack of discrepancies supported their defense. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the necessity of thorough investigations and considering compliance methods like the ERP system. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384911