<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1668 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282821</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal for the confiscation of betel nuts and the vehicle used for transportation. The Tribunal emphasized the Revenue&#039;s failure to provide concrete evidence of illegal smuggling, considering the local production of betel nuts in India. Without substantial proof of smuggling, the confiscation was deemed unwarranted, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and the disposal of the Revenue&#039;s stay petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1668 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282821</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal for the confiscation of betel nuts and the vehicle used for transportation. The Tribunal emphasized the Revenue&#039;s failure to provide concrete evidence of illegal smuggling, considering the local production of betel nuts in India. Without substantial proof of smuggling, the confiscation was deemed unwarranted, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and the disposal of the Revenue&#039;s stay petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>