<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 65 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19487</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a practicing lawyer, allowing the deduction under section 80U of the Income-tax Act for the assessment years 1979-80 and 1980-81 due to a permanent disability in the right eye. The court found the denial of the deduction by the Income-tax Officer to be erroneous, quashed the challenged orders, and directed a reassessment in line with the Act. No costs were awarded, and any security amount was to be refunded to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:32:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 65 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19487</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a practicing lawyer, allowing the deduction under section 80U of the Income-tax Act for the assessment years 1979-80 and 1980-81 due to a permanent disability in the right eye. The court found the denial of the deduction by the Income-tax Officer to be erroneous, quashed the challenged orders, and directed a reassessment in line with the Act. No costs were awarded, and any security amount was to be refunded to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>