<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1767 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282808</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the late filing fee under section 234E for delayed TDS return filing, citing the absence of authority for the AO to levy the fee for periods before 1.6.2015 and aligning with a Karnataka High Court judgment. The decision emphasized statutory provisions, directing the AO to delete the fee of Rs. 8,200 and allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 17:22:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1767 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282808</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the late filing fee under section 234E for delayed TDS return filing, citing the absence of authority for the AO to levy the fee for periods before 1.6.2015 and aligning with a Karnataka High Court judgment. The decision emphasized statutory provisions, directing the AO to delete the fee of Rs. 8,200 and allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>