<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1536 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282806</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, deleting the penalty imposed under section 18(1)(c) of the Wealth Tax Act for both assessment years. The penalty was deemed unsustainable as there was no concealment of material facts, and the appellant genuinely believed the properties did not qualify as assets under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 17:20:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1536 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282806</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, deleting the penalty imposed under section 18(1)(c) of the Wealth Tax Act for both assessment years. The penalty was deemed unsustainable as there was no concealment of material facts, and the appellant genuinely believed the properties did not qualify as assets under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>