<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 65 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19483</link>
    <description>A voluntary payment is taxable as professional or vocational income only if it accrues by virtue of the recipient&#039;s office, profession or vocation and is referable to services rendered; the Revenue must show a real and proximate link between the receipt and those services. Where the payment is made as a personal testimonial out of esteem, regard or spiritual sentiment, it remains a non-taxable personal gift. On the facts noted, there was no evidence connecting the donor&#039;s gift to the assessee&#039;s ordinary services as a Khadim, and that finding of fact was not shown to be perverse; the receipt was therefore not taxable as income from profession or vocation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:21:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 65 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19483</link>
      <description>A voluntary payment is taxable as professional or vocational income only if it accrues by virtue of the recipient&#039;s office, profession or vocation and is referable to services rendered; the Revenue must show a real and proximate link between the receipt and those services. Where the payment is made as a personal testimonial out of esteem, regard or spiritual sentiment, it remains a non-taxable personal gift. On the facts noted, there was no evidence connecting the donor&#039;s gift to the assessee&#039;s ordinary services as a Khadim, and that finding of fact was not shown to be perverse; the receipt was therefore not taxable as income from profession or vocation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>