https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384889 The High Court of Madras, with Mr. Justice M. Sundar presiding, directed the first respondent to promptly evaluate and decide on the petitioner's representation seeking relief from attachment under the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017. The court ordered the first respondent to dispose of the representation within six weeks and communicate the decision to the petitioner within seven working days thereafter. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions, emphasizing the importance of timely action by the first respondent in addressing the petitioner's concerns under the CGST Act. en-us Wed, 07 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Mar 2025 11:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384889 The High Court of Madras, with Mr. Justice M. Sundar presiding, directed the first respondent to promptly evaluate and decide on the petitioner's representation seeking relief from attachment under the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017. The court ordered the first respondent to dispose of the representation within six weeks and communicate the decision to the petitioner within seven working days thereafter. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions, emphasizing the importance of timely action by the first respondent in addressing the petitioner's concerns under the CGST Act. Case-Laws GST Wed, 07 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384889