<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1075 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384886</link>
    <description>The High Court&#039;s direction required the Assessing Officer to verify the correct facts and grant TDS credit to the assessee. As the matter remained pending on factual verification, the Supreme Court found no reason to interfere and dismissed the special leave petition. Delay was condoned, but the petition was not entertained on the merits because the operative issue was limited to verification of facts and consequent TDS credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 11:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1075 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384886</link>
      <description>The High Court&#039;s direction required the Assessing Officer to verify the correct facts and grant TDS credit to the assessee. As the matter remained pending on factual verification, the Supreme Court found no reason to interfere and dismissed the special leave petition. Delay was condoned, but the petition was not entertained on the merits because the operative issue was limited to verification of facts and consequent TDS credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>