<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1030 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384841</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, upholding demands and penalties for certain periods related to services received from overseas providers under different categories. Penalties were set aside for specific periods, and the matter was remanded for further verification in one instance. The tribunal extended the benefit of Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, in setting aside penalties and making decisions on demands. The order was issued on 21.08.2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2020 13:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1030 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384841</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, upholding demands and penalties for certain periods related to services received from overseas providers under different categories. Penalties were set aside for specific periods, and the matter was remanded for further verification in one instance. The tribunal extended the benefit of Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, in setting aside penalties and making decisions on demands. The order was issued on 21.08.2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>