<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (7) TMI 35 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19473</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to treat dismantling charges as capital expenditure and value the scrap at Rs. 25,000. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, supporting the disallowance of the charges incurred by the assessee-company. The judgment emphasized the need for detailed justifications in tax assessments to prevent disputes over expenditure nature and valuation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:45:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (7) TMI 35 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19473</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to treat dismantling charges as capital expenditure and value the scrap at Rs. 25,000. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, supporting the disallowance of the charges incurred by the assessee-company. The judgment emphasized the need for detailed justifications in tax assessments to prevent disputes over expenditure nature and valuation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>