https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282791 The Tribunal set aside the demands for 'Renting of Immovable Property Service' and 'Management Maintenance & Repair Service' against the Mall owner. The penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was not specifically addressed. The appellant's actions were deemed justifiable due to legal uncertainties, and the demands were invalidated as the tax and interest were paid before the show cause notice, in compliance with the law. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was overturned. en-us Thu, 11 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Aug 2019 20:39:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282791 The Tribunal set aside the demands for 'Renting of Immovable Property Service' and 'Management Maintenance & Repair Service' against the Mall owner. The penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was not specifically addressed. The appellant's actions were deemed justifiable due to legal uncertainties, and the demands were invalidated as the tax and interest were paid before the show cause notice, in compliance with the law. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was overturned. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 11 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282791