<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1274 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282790</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the additions and disallowances made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A) totaling Rs. 1,01,18,000. The Tribunal found the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of the loan transaction and the creditworthiness of the lender, Moxdiam. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of satisfying the requirements of Section 68 of the Act and dismissed the appeals filed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 20:39:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1274 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282790</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the additions and disallowances made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A) totaling Rs. 1,01,18,000. The Tribunal found the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of the loan transaction and the creditworthiness of the lender, Moxdiam. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of satisfying the requirements of Section 68 of the Act and dismissed the appeals filed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>