<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1011 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384822</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, holding that the AO&#039;s assessment order was vitiated due to procedural lapses under Section 144C. However, the transfer pricing adjustment accepted by the assessee under MAP was sustained, and the total income was directed to be adopted accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 20:35:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1011 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384822</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, holding that the AO&#039;s assessment order was vitiated due to procedural lapses under Section 144C. However, the transfer pricing adjustment accepted by the assessee under MAP was sustained, and the total income was directed to be adopted accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>