<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 875 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282788</link>
    <description>Extortion was not made out because the complaint did not allege delivery of property or valuable security in response to any threat. Criminal trespass was also not established, as the allegations showed a business dispute and a visit connected with claimed dues, not entry with the requisite intent to commit an offence or intimidate, insult or annoy. No criminal conspiracy was disclosed because the alleged predicate offences were absent and no independent unlawful act was pleaded. The FIR was quashed since the allegations, on a plain reading, did not disclose the essential ingredients of the invoked offences and the criminal process could not continue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 18:25:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 875 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282788</link>
      <description>Extortion was not made out because the complaint did not allege delivery of property or valuable security in response to any threat. Criminal trespass was also not established, as the allegations showed a business dispute and a visit connected with claimed dues, not entry with the requisite intent to commit an offence or intimidate, insult or annoy. No criminal conspiracy was disclosed because the alleged predicate offences were absent and no independent unlawful act was pleaded. The FIR was quashed since the allegations, on a plain reading, did not disclose the essential ingredients of the invoked offences and the criminal process could not continue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>