<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1007 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384818</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the penalty imposed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal under the Customs Act on the appellant, a Customs House Agent, but reduced it from Rs. 30,00,000 to Rs. 15,00,000. The Tribunal found the appellant had failed to verify KYC norms in a previous consignment for the same importer, although not connected to the offending goods in the present case. The Court considered the appellant&#039;s lapse in verifying essential facts, leading to a penalty equivalent to the duty involved, totaling Rs. 1,77,401, to be deposited within four weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2020 17:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1007 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384818</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the penalty imposed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal under the Customs Act on the appellant, a Customs House Agent, but reduced it from Rs. 30,00,000 to Rs. 15,00,000. The Tribunal found the appellant had failed to verify KYC norms in a previous consignment for the same importer, although not connected to the offending goods in the present case. The Court considered the appellant&#039;s lapse in verifying essential facts, leading to a penalty equivalent to the duty involved, totaling Rs. 1,77,401, to be deposited within four weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>