<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1005 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384816</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, nullifying the confiscation of 8 kg gold bars and the vehicle, as well as the imposed penalties on the appellants. The decision highlighted the necessity of thorough verification and consideration of evidence in adjudication proceedings, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellants due to insufficient substantiation of smuggling claims and unjustified penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2020 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1005 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384816</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, nullifying the confiscation of 8 kg gold bars and the vehicle, as well as the imposed penalties on the appellants. The decision highlighted the necessity of thorough verification and consideration of evidence in adjudication proceedings, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellants due to insufficient substantiation of smuggling claims and unjustified penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>