https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384807 The Court upheld the ITSC's order dated 4th August 2016, validating the rejection of settlement applications under Section 245D(4). Notices issued on 6th April 2017 and 4th July 2017 were deemed valid, as the limitation period for assessments was extended by one year from the date of the ITSC's order. Writ petitions were dismissed, emphasizing the ITSC's authority to reject applications and the extended limitation period. Interim orders were vacated, and no costs were awarded. en-us Mon, 19 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Jun 2026 09:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384807 The Court upheld the ITSC's order dated 4th August 2016, validating the rejection of settlement applications under Section 245D(4). Notices issued on 6th April 2017 and 4th July 2017 were deemed valid, as the limitation period for assessments was extended by one year from the date of the ITSC's order. Writ petitions were dismissed, emphasizing the ITSC's authority to reject applications and the extended limitation period. Interim orders were vacated, and no costs were awarded. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 19 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384807