<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 983 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384794</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, granting the deduction under Section 54B for the investment in new agricultural land made within the extended period under Section 139(4). The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the spirit of the law and the genuine circumstances that delayed the investment. The issue of whether the land was a capital asset under Section 2(14)(iii) was not addressed in detail as the primary relief was granted under Section 54B.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2019 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 983 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384794</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, granting the deduction under Section 54B for the investment in new agricultural land made within the extended period under Section 139(4). The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the spirit of the law and the genuine circumstances that delayed the investment. The issue of whether the land was a capital asset under Section 2(14)(iii) was not addressed in detail as the primary relief was granted under Section 54B.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>