<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 981 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384792</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all three appeals filed by the revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order to delete the additions made under Section 68 and validating the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing the assessee an opportunity to cross-examine witnesses and the necessity for the AO to gather substantive evidence when making additions under Section 68.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 07:30:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 981 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384792</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all three appeals filed by the revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order to delete the additions made under Section 68 and validating the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing the assessee an opportunity to cross-examine witnesses and the necessity for the AO to gather substantive evidence when making additions under Section 68.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>