<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 976 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384787</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD set aside the penalties imposed under section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 on individuals involved in the illegal export of rice to Nepal. The Tribunal found that the penalties were unjustified as they were solely based on uncorroborated statements without proper cross-examination or examination in chief, contrary to the requirements of the Customs Act. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of corroborative evidence and proper examination procedures for the admissibility of statements as evidence, ultimately allowing the appeals of the individuals and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal for penalty imposition on a company due to discrepancies in the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 07:30:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 976 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384787</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD set aside the penalties imposed under section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 on individuals involved in the illegal export of rice to Nepal. The Tribunal found that the penalties were unjustified as they were solely based on uncorroborated statements without proper cross-examination or examination in chief, contrary to the requirements of the Customs Act. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of corroborative evidence and proper examination procedures for the admissibility of statements as evidence, ultimately allowing the appeals of the individuals and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal for penalty imposition on a company due to discrepancies in the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>