<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 972 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, SINGLE BENCH, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384783</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Resolution Professional&#039;s decision to reject the claims due to non-compliance with statutory requirements and lack of credible evidence supporting alleged cash transactions. The court deemed the cash transactions fraudulent, emphasizing adherence to procedural requirements under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and CIRP Regulations. The Applicant&#039;s claims were dismissed, affirming the RP&#039;s stance on the inadmissibility of the claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 07:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 972 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, SINGLE BENCH, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384783</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Resolution Professional&#039;s decision to reject the claims due to non-compliance with statutory requirements and lack of credible evidence supporting alleged cash transactions. The court deemed the cash transactions fraudulent, emphasizing adherence to procedural requirements under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and CIRP Regulations. The Applicant&#039;s claims were dismissed, affirming the RP&#039;s stance on the inadmissibility of the claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>