<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (12) TMI 61 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19461</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, quashed the impugned orders denying exemption to the petitioner-trust under section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment years 1979-80 to 1983-84, and remitted the matters to the respondent for fresh assessment. The court held that the trust qualified for exemption under section 11 despite the introduction of section 13(1)(bb) as the business activities were incidental to fulfilling the trust&#039;s charitable purposes. The court also found the writ petitions maintainable despite the availability of alternative remedies due to the prolonged pendency and the need for prompt resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:51:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (12) TMI 61 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19461</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, quashed the impugned orders denying exemption to the petitioner-trust under section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment years 1979-80 to 1983-84, and remitted the matters to the respondent for fresh assessment. The court held that the trust qualified for exemption under section 11 despite the introduction of section 13(1)(bb) as the business activities were incidental to fulfilling the trust&#039;s charitable purposes. The court also found the writ petitions maintainable despite the availability of alternative remedies due to the prolonged pendency and the need for prompt resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>