https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384757 The High Court upheld the Metropolitan Magistrate's order directing the issuance of process against the petitioner and co-accused under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found prima facie evidence against both accused, emphasizing the need for a trial to determine liability. The petitioner's claims of non-involvement in the cheque transaction were countered by evidence suggesting joint liability with her husband. Allegations of malafide intentions and procedural impropriety in approaching the High Court directly were dismissed, with the court stressing the importance of following proper legal procedures. The writ petition was rejected, allowing for further examination of the case during trial proceedings. en-us Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Aug 2019 07:24:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384757 The High Court upheld the Metropolitan Magistrate's order directing the issuance of process against the petitioner and co-accused under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found prima facie evidence against both accused, emphasizing the need for a trial to determine liability. The petitioner's claims of non-involvement in the cheque transaction were countered by evidence suggesting joint liability with her husband. Allegations of malafide intentions and procedural impropriety in approaching the High Court directly were dismissed, with the court stressing the importance of following proper legal procedures. The writ petition was rejected, allowing for further examination of the case during trial proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384757