https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282767 The court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing that detailed inquiries into Companies Act violations fall under authorities' purview, not writ jurisdiction. It highlighted the importance of shareholder meetings under the corporate democracy principle and ruled the petitioner was not entitled to relief post-AGM. The court clarified the availability of remedies through the Company Law Board until the NCLT is functional. As the petitioner did not challenge the Company Law Board's efficacy, the court granted liberty to pursue other remedies, leaving all parties' rights open. en-us Wed, 23 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Aug 2019 20:38:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282767 The court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing that detailed inquiries into Companies Act violations fall under authorities' purview, not writ jurisdiction. It highlighted the importance of shareholder meetings under the corporate democracy principle and ruled the petitioner was not entitled to relief post-AGM. The court clarified the availability of remedies through the Company Law Board until the NCLT is functional. As the petitioner did not challenge the Company Law Board's efficacy, the court granted liberty to pursue other remedies, leaving all parties' rights open. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 23 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282767