https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282765 An ex parte interim injunction must comply with Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC by recording reasons for dispensing with notice and by showing why delay would defeat the object of relief; failure to state such reasons, or to explain the basis for status quo, prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury, amounts to procedural illegality and violation of natural justice. Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 may still be invoked despite an appellate remedy where the subordinate court order shows a patent jurisdictional or procedural defect and cannot be effectively tested on merits because it is unreasoned. On that basis, the ex parte interim order was set aside and the interim application remitted for fresh consideration after hearing both parties. en-us Mon, 18 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Aug 2019 20:38:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282765 An ex parte interim injunction must comply with Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC by recording reasons for dispensing with notice and by showing why delay would defeat the object of relief; failure to state such reasons, or to explain the basis for status quo, prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury, amounts to procedural illegality and violation of natural justice. Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 may still be invoked despite an appellate remedy where the subordinate court order shows a patent jurisdictional or procedural defect and cannot be effectively tested on merits because it is unreasoned. On that basis, the ex parte interim order was set aside and the interim application remitted for fresh consideration after hearing both parties. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 18 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282765