<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1477 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282772</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1,50,00,000/- as the assessee proved sufficient cash balance and proper recording of the transaction. The deletion of Rs. 50,26,604/- was also upheld, as the transactions were deemed business advances, not dividends under Section 2(22)(e). The appeal was dismissed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2019 20:38:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1477 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282772</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1,50,00,000/- as the assessee proved sufficient cash balance and proper recording of the transaction. The deletion of Rs. 50,26,604/- was also upheld, as the transactions were deemed business advances, not dividends under Section 2(22)(e). The appeal was dismissed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>