<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (11) TMI 78 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19452</link>
    <description>The court allowed the applications under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, addressing the maintainability issue raised by the Revenue. It clarified that a single reference application is adequate for multiple appeals arising from one assessment if disposed of by a consolidated order. The court directed the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to refer the question of law regarding the justification of upholding profit estimates despite the assessee maintaining business accounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:29:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (11) TMI 78 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19452</link>
      <description>The court allowed the applications under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, addressing the maintainability issue raised by the Revenue. It clarified that a single reference application is adequate for multiple appeals arising from one assessment if disposed of by a consolidated order. The court directed the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to refer the question of law regarding the justification of upholding profit estimates despite the assessee maintaining business accounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>