https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19443 The court quashed the notices and assessment orders for various years due to jurisdictional errors by the Assessing Officer and Valuation Officer. The Assessing Officer's actions post-remand were found to exceed the appellate orders' scope, rendering assessments invalid. Notices for revaluation were deemed illegal for going beyond the appellate directions. The court emphasized the finality of original assessment orders pending appeal and rejected a technical objection on filing separate writ petitions. The Assessing Officer was directed to reassess in line with the appellate orders, and the petitions were allowed without costs. en-us Fri, 26 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:10:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19443 The court quashed the notices and assessment orders for various years due to jurisdictional errors by the Assessing Officer and Valuation Officer. The Assessing Officer's actions post-remand were found to exceed the appellate orders' scope, rendering assessments invalid. Notices for revaluation were deemed illegal for going beyond the appellate directions. The court emphasized the finality of original assessment orders pending appeal and rejected a technical objection on filing separate writ petitions. The Assessing Officer was directed to reassess in line with the appellate orders, and the petitions were allowed without costs. Case-Laws Wealth-tax Fri, 26 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19443