<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 925 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384736</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income, emphasizing the lack of bona fide in the assessee&#039;s claim for set-off of business losses against income from house property. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order and the AO&#039;s findings. The Tribunal stressed the significance of genuine claims and adherence to procedural requirements in tax disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2019 07:44:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 925 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384736</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income, emphasizing the lack of bona fide in the assessee&#039;s claim for set-off of business losses against income from house property. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order and the AO&#039;s findings. The Tribunal stressed the significance of genuine claims and adherence to procedural requirements in tax disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>