<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (12) TMI 11 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19439</link>
    <description>The High Court held that income from other sources and capital gains should be assessed separately for each spouse under the Portuguese Civil Code. The court emphasized that income possessed jointly by spouses should be assessed individually. It distinguished between income from joint investments and business activities of the couple, stating that investment income should be assessed separately for each spouse. The decision affirmed lower authorities&#039; rulings and favored the assessees, with no cost orders issued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:00:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (12) TMI 11 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19439</link>
      <description>The High Court held that income from other sources and capital gains should be assessed separately for each spouse under the Portuguese Civil Code. The court emphasized that income possessed jointly by spouses should be assessed individually. It distinguished between income from joint investments and business activities of the couple, stating that investment income should be assessed separately for each spouse. The decision affirmed lower authorities&#039; rulings and favored the assessees, with no cost orders issued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>