<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Invalidates Six-Year Reassessment Under DVAT Act; Section 5 Bars Combining DVAT and CST Liabilities.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48818</link>
    <description>Reopening of assessment - time limitation - DVAT Act - Revenue has sought to make no distinction between the liability under the DVAT and that under the CST Act. In terms of Section 5 of the DVAT Act these two could not be combined. - the reopening of the assessment by invoking the extended period of 6 years was bad in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2019 07:35:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2019 07:35:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Invalidates Six-Year Reassessment Under DVAT Act; Section 5 Bars Combining DVAT and CST Liabilities.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48818</link>
      <description>Reopening of assessment - time limitation - DVAT Act - Revenue has sought to make no distinction between the liability under the DVAT and that under the CST Act. In terms of Section 5 of the DVAT Act these two could not be combined. - the reopening of the assessment by invoking the extended period of 6 years was bad in law.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2019 07:35:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>