<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1839 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282736</link>
    <description>The appeal challenged the disallowance of provision against Bank&#039;s Debtors as per RBI guidelines. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance of Rs. 1,93,30,000/- following a precedent involving a Co-operative Bank. Emphasizing alignment with RBI guidelines, the Tribunal allowed the provision, stating it served the purpose of creating a reserve for bad and doubtful debts. The decision highlighted the importance of consistency in applying legal principles and aligning provisions with regulatory guidelines to ensure fair outcomes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 20:14:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1839 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282736</link>
      <description>The appeal challenged the disallowance of provision against Bank&#039;s Debtors as per RBI guidelines. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance of Rs. 1,93,30,000/- following a precedent involving a Co-operative Bank. Emphasizing alignment with RBI guidelines, the Tribunal allowed the provision, stating it served the purpose of creating a reserve for bad and doubtful debts. The decision highlighted the importance of consistency in applying legal principles and aligning provisions with regulatory guidelines to ensure fair outcomes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>