<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1684 - ITAT  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282748</link>
    <description>The appeals challenging the deletion of additions under various sections of the Income Tax Act were largely dismissed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in most cases, finding the assessee provided sufficient evidence to support the deletions. However, in one instance, the Tribunal remanded the matter back to the AO for reconsideration regarding the deletion under Section 14A, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Maxopp Investment Ltd. vs. CIT.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 20:14:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1684 - ITAT  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282748</link>
      <description>The appeals challenging the deletion of additions under various sections of the Income Tax Act were largely dismissed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in most cases, finding the assessee provided sufficient evidence to support the deletions. However, in one instance, the Tribunal remanded the matter back to the AO for reconsideration regarding the deletion under Section 14A, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Maxopp Investment Ltd. vs. CIT.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>