<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1610 - ITAT JALANDHAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282749</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, condoning the delay and setting aside the addition made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, providing relief to the assessee. The decision was based on the legal interpretation that bank accounts or passbooks do not qualify as &quot;books of account&quot; under Section 68, following established legal precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1610 - ITAT JALANDHAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282749</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, condoning the delay and setting aside the addition made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, providing relief to the assessee. The decision was based on the legal interpretation that bank accounts or passbooks do not qualify as &quot;books of account&quot; under Section 68, following established legal precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>