https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282727 The Andhra Pradesh HC held that writ material disclosing a prima facie quid pro quo pattern between governmental favours and unusually large investments justified registration of a crime and investigation by a specialised agency, without requiring a roving factual inquiry in writ jurisdiction. It found allegations of corruption, money laundering and criminal conspiracy sufficiently supported on the record to warrant investigation in the public interest. The Court also held that a separate writ petition based mainly on internet material, without a disclosed or authentic source, was not entertainable as a public interest petition and did not merit separate adjudication. Accordingly, the connected petitions seeking investigation were allowed, while the unsupported petition was rejected. en-us Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 May 2024 14:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282727 The Andhra Pradesh HC held that writ material disclosing a prima facie quid pro quo pattern between governmental favours and unusually large investments justified registration of a crime and investigation by a specialised agency, without requiring a roving factual inquiry in writ jurisdiction. It found allegations of corruption, money laundering and criminal conspiracy sufficiently supported on the record to warrant investigation in the public interest. The Court also held that a separate writ petition based mainly on internet material, without a disclosed or authentic source, was not entertainable as a public interest petition and did not merit separate adjudication. Accordingly, the connected petitions seeking investigation were allowed, while the unsupported petition was rejected. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282727