<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (8) TMI 18 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19431</link>
    <description>Enhanced remuneration paid to a director was held allowable as a deduction where the payment was for services actually rendered, even though approval under section 314 of the Companies Act, 1956 was not obtained at the first general body meeting. The amount was later placed before an extraordinary general meeting and approved, and the Court followed its earlier rulings that an Income-tax Officer cannot deny deduction merely because there was a company law infraction in the mode of payment. The deduction was therefore allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:41:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (8) TMI 18 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19431</link>
      <description>Enhanced remuneration paid to a director was held allowable as a deduction where the payment was for services actually rendered, even though approval under section 314 of the Companies Act, 1956 was not obtained at the first general body meeting. The amount was later placed before an extraordinary general meeting and approved, and the Court followed its earlier rulings that an Income-tax Officer cannot deny deduction merely because there was a company law infraction in the mode of payment. The deduction was therefore allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>