<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 892 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384703</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty order under Section 272A(2)(c) imposed on the assessee for non-compliance with the notice issued under Section 133(6) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the ITO (Intelligence) had the jurisdiction to issue the notice and that there was no reasonable cause for the non-furnishing of information. The appeal by the assessee was dismissed, affirming the validity of the penalty imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2022 16:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 892 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384703</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty order under Section 272A(2)(c) imposed on the assessee for non-compliance with the notice issued under Section 133(6) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the ITO (Intelligence) had the jurisdiction to issue the notice and that there was no reasonable cause for the non-furnishing of information. The appeal by the assessee was dismissed, affirming the validity of the penalty imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>