<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 889 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384700</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. It vacated the addition of Rs. 1,88,04,000 sustained by the CIT(A) and deleted the entire addition of Rs. 3,88,78,000 made by the A.O. The Tribunal emphasized the need to consider the seized document in its entirety and upheld the presumption of its contents being true as per Section 292C of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 12:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 889 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384700</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. It vacated the addition of Rs. 1,88,04,000 sustained by the CIT(A) and deleted the entire addition of Rs. 3,88,78,000 made by the A.O. The Tribunal emphasized the need to consider the seized document in its entirety and upheld the presumption of its contents being true as per Section 292C of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>